Historical (2026-08-31): accurate when written; see CHANGELOG for what changed since.
Autonomous Workflow V2 Component Probes
Candidate revision: 0030e12 plus this evidence note
Date: 2026-08-31
Scope: sequence 15 of docs/dynamic-workflow-v2-execution-plan.md
These probes exercised the model-sensitive boundaries separately before any end-to-end autonomous canary. Every paid call used a Relay GPT-5.6 Luna pool. No Minimax or Fable model was eligible. A failed or rejected model response would have stopped the sequence; none occurred.
Results
| Boundary | Pool and model | Result | Wall | Known tokens | Durable evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial planner program | opencode2 / relay/gpt-5.6-luna | Accepted by the real V2 planner-response parser without correction | 58.0 s | 1,230 | ~/.bullswarm/runs/out-1788187364874-j3wtn.md |
| Bounded mutating worker | opencode2 / relay/gpt-5.6-luna | Changed only src/counter.js in a disposable repository; external tests passed 2/2 | 32.9 s | 241 | ~/.bullswarm/runs/out-1788187490363-5dkb2.md |
| Evidence envelope and worker self-validation | opencode2 / relay/gpt-5.6-luna | Worker ran check-v2-evidence.js; runtime parser accepted one scoped passing requirement with no concerns | 50.6 s | 487 | ~/.bullswarm/runs/out-1788187584619-o9wjr.md |
| Consolidated semantic-gap planning | opencode2 / relay/gpt-5.6-luna | Accepted exactly one bounded fix plus one evidence action; no reviewer, repair, or reverify loop | 36.7 s | 756 | ~/.bullswarm/runs/out-1788187686903-z2ubs.md |
| Authentication replacement | simulated unavailable Luna, then opencode2:relay-2 / relay-2/gpt-5.6-luna | First attempt classified auth and quarantined; second pool completed immediately | 0.1 s + 28.6 s | 61 + 168 | isolated route state and output under the temporary bullswarm-v2-route-y45TRb fixture |
The routing probe used the production dispatchV2Action and watchOnce seam. Only the first connector was synthetic: it emitted an authentication failure. The replacement was the real configured Relay-2 OpenCode connector. The probe passed only after asserting the exact attempt order, quarantine record, two durable decision-log entries, successful output content, and the replacement model ID. Its isolated Bullswarm home prevented the simulated failure from quarantining a real user pool.
Presentation boundaries
The result, quiet-watch, and human-TUI boundaries are deterministic consumers of durable V2 state, so they were probed without another paid model call:
- native V2
runs list,show, and stableresultenvelope: 1 focused test passed; - compact V2 watch heartbeat, freshness, terminal result handoff: 1 focused test passed; and
- durable timeline, live-agent filtering, narrow/mobile layout, and non-clearing spinner repaint: 3 focused tests passed.
The broader result/watch/dashboard component batch passed 54/54 tests. These checks prove each sequence-15 boundary in isolation. They do not count toward the sequence-16 five-run end-to-end streak.
Sequence-15 conclusion
All five model-in-the-loop component probes completed without content rejection, schema correction, semantic repair loops, ownership violations, or use of a disallowed model. Planner validity, worker execution, evidence validation, gap handling, provider replacement, stable result consumption, quiet watch, and wide/mobile TUI rendering are ready for end-to-end canaries.